Pieces Coming Together at Brittenden’s Borough Council

Posted by on Apr 12, 2011 | 5 Comments

Mr Brittenden making a nuisance of himself earlier

Mr Brittenden making a nuisance of himself earlier

Despite a couple of minor disturbances, the flames of democracy continued to flicker at the second meeting of the newly-formed Devonport Borough Council this week.

Under the equanimous eye of David Slack, the DBC (Devonport Borough Council) receive its first report on the lie of the local government land, and learned of the many “plans” currently being hatched by the council.

Mike Cohen brandished some sandwich boards with boxes and arrows in an attempt to explain the three-pronged plan proposal which has landed in the laps of every Auckland resident foolish enough to attempt to take an interest in local politics.

While Mike Cohen was attempting to explicate the endless entrails of the Spatial, Local Board and Unitary Plans, Simon Gundry, who had earlier created an unpleasant scene when he attempted to shout down another attendee, complained that Cohen had turned the occasion into a “political meeting.”

This suggestion was in turn shouted down by a weary majority, and Gundry, realising he may have overstepped the mark, adopted a more repentant tone, later apologising for his behaviour.

Despite the drama, Cohen’s presentation made it clear there was some work to be done to understand the implications of the various plans, all of which present both benefits and hazards for Devonport’s future.

Here again, the green shoots of local democracy could be seen, with several attendees volunteering to digest the plans – heavily laced as they are with corporate speak – and regurgitate the salient points to the next meeting.

Claudia Page reported on an issue that has arisen regarding the Marine Square upgrade; apparently the council had overlooked the fact that their plan included the destruction of a section of the sea wall – currently protected under a preservation order.

By the end of the meeting, The Speculator could see the skeleton of a process emerging; Report In – Digest/Analyse  – Report Back – Recommend/ Advocate.

It’s also interesting to note that no one individual has yet come to dominate; Roger Brittenden himself is quite happy to observe the proceedings and to play a minimal role, and David Slack is quick to pass the talking stick.

So despite all the talk, what actions were agreed? (“Measure outputs, not inputs” as The Speculator used to mindlessly parrot in his days at the corporate coalface).

ACTIONS

1: Robyn Langwell, Claudia Page and others to digest the three plans and report back to the next meeting on which issues the plans raise that are of relevance to Devonport;

2: The Speculator to publish web links to all the plans and the locations to place feedback;

3: The Speculator to publish the minutes from each future meeting;

4: Claudia Page to establish an email address to receive meeting agenda items.

Not bad for a night’s work.

5 comments

  1. GB says:

    I hear alot of talk in Devo but no action and everyone busy formulating plans with this and that, when are we all jus going to go to the next Taka/Devonport community board meeting together and jus tell them everything what we really need as a community concerned about the out of control burecratic brain disfunctions going on??

  2. GB says:

    Should be much easier to form our own kingdom now as Hide is gone!LOL..Did I crack up laughing when I saw on tv that Brash has taken over.

  3. GB says:

    Ruth, come along to the meeting at the RSA on Tues night, err 6pm, ask the hard questions there, as that one is important the question you ask there, considering the Devo wharf is the gateway to the North Shore and first impressions count eh..

  4. Ruth says:

    Good to read about… but glad I wasn’t there!

    Any progress on the dreadful state of public toilets in Devonport?

  5. Claudia says:

    correction – Council haven’t overlooked the protected status of the seawall, it is mentioned in their application, but they have not provided a Conservation plan, which “identifies the heritage significance of an item and sets out how the applicant proposes to retain or recover heritage significance”. Instead they appear to have decided without the benefit of a conservation plan to provide information, that demolition of a section of the wall is insignificant.

Leave a comment

Lake Rd Traffic Cam
Devonport Calendar Business and Service Directory Cafe Directory
Urgent and Non-urgent Services/ Local Accomodation Teamer
Advertisement

Subscription

Subscribe by e-mail You can subscribe by e-mail to receive news updates and breaking stories.

RSS Follow Us on Twitter

Categories